I do have a handheld garmin I use for kayaking/hiking/etc, and another unit for cycling. I think the dedicated units (garmin, tom tom, etc) are great for basic navigation, but Google maps with its live updating and Waze for real time traffic, police, etc are way more powerful. I often end up chasing by myself and I just need to be able to glance quickly at the screen and see what my road options are, etc. I also use Google maps (or Waze in cities) simultaneously on my phone and/or tablet when I'm trying to find a hotel or want an ETA or something, but it eats data and you have to keep it alive on the screen somehow and I have lost data many times at critical times. My initial testing with Delorme and the Lightroom integration seems to work great, and with a Windows 8 touchscreen laptop it's pretty cool to just drag around the maps on the screen-I run a split screen between the map software and GRLevel when I'm in chase mode. It would break each GPS trail into hundreds of segments, come up in a distant time zone (UTC?), etc. I moved this time back to Delorme because the GPS tracking in Streets and Trips was causing me all kinds of problems when trying to tag my photos using the map features of Lightroom. I used Delorme Street Atlas back in the 90's and then a few years ago got into Streets and Trips, and now I just moved back to Delorme. It's biggest drawback is when you are in the rare situation when cell data is unavailable but that's why a dedicated GPS navigation device pays for itself. ![]() I'm not a fan of Google, but their Maps app is far superior to anything else out there and it's free. And it's also hard to beat for easily finding anything you could ever need to find in terms of businesses. If you want a quick, broader view, paper maps never fail.īut honestly, if you're going to use a laptop (or better yet an apple Ipad) Google Maps app is hard to beat for accuracy and keeping up to date with new roads, without constant downloads, plus it has the added benefit of live traffic conditions across ALL well-traveled roads, it's fast and very efficient. Save the laptop for radar, location plotting, and weather web page access. They use the same map database (Navteq) that the others use, plus have logging features and a multitude of other navigation related features. Plus, with "North Up" turned on it helps keep you better aware of your location orientation IMO. suggested in the past, but they have never worked reliably for me so I cannot recommend them.I could never figure out why a lot of guys want to use a laptop and mapping software when highly functional and relatively cheap GPS units are out there that will mount in the windshield in ready view and are easy to operate with the touch of a finger. However, this doesn't affect the actual positions reported.Īs an alternative to the above, I have seen GPSDirect, GPSReverse, GPSComplete etc. The one drawback is that the virtual COM port feed seems to have a lag of about 1-2 seconds relative to the Windows Location Service itself, but I doubt this is too big of a problem for your purposes.Īnother little detail is that legacy applications may think the GPS sensor is seeing fewer satellites than it actually is. I have not extensively tested this combination but so far it has worked when I've tried it. GPSGate will then read the Windows Location feed and feed simulated NMEA messages to virtual COM ports for use in GRLevel3, SpotterNetwork, etc. Together with the splitter plugin installer that allows GPSGate to use the Windows Location API as input. The easiest way to get it working with GRLevel3 is to use the latest version of Franson GPSGate Splitter ![]() It will not work with legacy programs expecting a serial interface, such as GRLevel3. ![]() ![]() You need to get the "u-blox GNSS Sensor Device Driver for Windows, v2.40" from :īy default, this will ONLY work with applications using the Windows Location Services, such as Windows 10 Maps.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |